RED-ACT Report
Real-time Earthquake Damage Assessment using City-scale Time-history analysis
Jan. 26, Japan Kumamoto-ken Kumamoto-chiho Earthquake
Research group of Xinzheng Lu at Tsinghua University
luxz@tsinghua.edu.cn
First reported at 13:50, Jan. 26, 2019 (Beijing Time, UTC +8)
Acknowledgments and Disclaimer
The authors are grateful for the data provided by K-NET and KiK-net.
This analysis is for research only. The actual damage resulting from the earthquake should be determined according to the site investigation.
1. Introduction to the earthquake event
At 14: 16, Jan. 26, 2019 (Local Time, UTC +9), an M 4.4 (JMA) earthquake occurred in Kumamoto-ken Kumamoto-chiho, Japan. The epicenter was located at 33.0N, 130.6E, with a depth of 10.0 km. The maximal recorded peak ground acceleration (PGA) is 95cm/s/s.
2. Recorded ground motions
20 ground motions near to epicenter of this earthquake were analyzed.
No. Station Name Longitude Latitude
1 FKO011 130.512 33.3235
2 FKO013 130.561 33.2252
3 FKO014 130.818 33.1491
4 FKO015 130.405 33.1627
5 FKO016 130.447 33.0159
6 KGS001 130.176 32.1947
7 KMM001 131.069 33.1208
8 KMM002 130.685 33.0185
9 KMM003 130.548 32.9336
10 KMM005 130.877 32.8761
11 KMM008 130.658 32.6878
12 KMM009 130.989 32.6864
13 KMM011 130.865 32.6167
14 KMM012 130.602 32.5078
15 NGS012 130.346 32.7884
16 NGS014 130.185 32.6106
17 OIT005 131.114 33.4549
18 SAG003 130.207 33.373
19 SAG005 130.064 33.3213
20 SAG007 130.3 33.2627
3. Seismic damage analysis for target region subjected to the recorded ground motions
Using the real-time ground motions obtained from the strong motion networks and the city-scale nonlinear time-history analysis (see the Appendix of this report), the damage ratios of buildings located in different places can be obtained. These damage ratios can provide a reference for post-earthquake rescue work. The damage ratio distribution of the buildings near to different stations is shown in Figure 1. The human comfortableness distribution near to different stations is shown in Figure 2.
The details can be accessed at
http://www.luxinzheng.net/software/2019-01-26-Japan-4.4.html
http://www.luxinzheng.net/software/2019-01-26-Japan-4.4-Acc.html
Figure 1 Damage ratio distribution of the buildings near to different stations
Figure 2 Human comfortableness distribution near to different stations
附:党纪教授发来的日方分析结果
---------End--------
相关研究
相关文章,在仿真秀官网搜索:
场地-城市耦合弹塑性分析+神威太湖之光+无人机 | 三项黑科技助力新北川县城震害预测
综述:城市抗震弹塑性分析及其工程应用
新论文:适用于多LOD BIM的建筑地震损失评估
新论文:新型地震和连续倒塌综合防御韧性PC框架承载力计算方法
新论文:角柱失效后平板结构连续倒塌行为实验研究
新论文:城市建筑群多LOD震害模拟及北京CBD算例
美国NSF SimCenter+清华城市弹塑性分析=旧金山184万建筑地震模拟
新论文:受折纸启发的可更换承载-耗能双功能耗能器
新综述论文:21世纪建筑结构连续倒塌和鲁棒性的研究和实践
新论文:中柱失效后板柱结构连续倒塌传力机理研究
新论文:一根钢筋混凝土梁,承载力你能算对么?| 梁的压拱效应计算方法
新论文:无人机+机器学习+城市弹塑性分析=震后近实时损失预测
新论文:这个混凝土框架能抗震,能防连续倒塌,还功能可恢复,您不进来看看么?
新论文:一个好汉三个帮|带端部阻尼器伸臂桁架的抗震性能试验研究
新论文:BIM+新一代性能化设计=喷淋系统破坏后的地震次生火灾模拟
新论文:村镇建筑群火灾蔓延模拟与案例
新论文:建设地震韧性城市所面临的挑战
新论文:烈焰焚城 | 地震次生火灾的精细化和高真实感模拟
新论文:城市韧性——基于“三度空间下系统的系统”的思考
新论文:防屈曲支撑伸臂桁架?几个“狗骨头”可少不了!
新论文:城市抗震弹塑性分析中如何确定高层建筑的损伤程度?
新论文:考虑楼板影响的钢筋混凝土框架边柱连续倒塌试验
新论文:提高地震荷载分项系数,抗震安全性提高了多少?
新论文:采用减振子结构来控制超高层建筑的地震楼面加速度
新论文:500m级超高层建筑简化模型及其在结构体系对比中的应用
606m 超高层建筑OpenSees模型