RED-ACT Report
Real-time Earthquake Damage Assessment using City-scale Time-history analysis
Apr. 24, M4.8 New Zealand Dannevirke Earthquake
Research group of Xinzheng Lu at Tsinghua University (luxz@tsinghua.edu.cn)
First reported at 14:00, Apr. 25, 2019 (Beijing Time, UTC +8)
Acknowledgments and Disclaimer
The authors are grateful for the data provided by GeoNet. This analysis is for research only. The actual damage resulting from the earthquake should be determined according to the site investigation.
Scientific background of this report can be found at:
http://www.luxinzheng.net/software/Real-Time_Report.pdf
1. Introduction to the earthquake event
At Apr 24 2019 4:37 (Local Time), an M 4.8 (GeoNet) earthquake occurred in New Zealand Dannevirke. The epicenter was located at 175.97 -40.26, with a depth of 25.0 km.
2. Recorded ground motions
33 ground motions near to epicenter of this earthquake were analyzed. The names and locations of the stations can be found Table 1. The maximal recorded peak ground acceleration (PGA) is 42 cm/s/s. The corresponding response spectra in comparison with the design spectra specified in the Chinese Code for Seismic Design of Buildings are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Response spectra of the recorded ground motions with maximal PGA
3. Damage analysis of the target region subjected to the recorded ground motions
Using the real-time ground motions obtained from the strong motion networks and the city-scale nonlinear time-history analysis (see the Appendix of this report), the damage ratios of buildings located in different places can be obtained. The building damage distribution and the human uncomfortableness distribution near to different stations is shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. These outcomes can provide a reference for post-earthquake rescue work.
Figure 2 Damage ratio distribution of the buildings near to different stations
Figure 3 Human uncomfortableness distribution near to different stations
Scientific background of this report can be found at: http://www.luxinzheng.net/software/Real-Time_Report.pdf
Table 1 Names and locations of the strong motion stations
No. Station Name Longitude Latitude
1 20190423_163716_TSZ_20 175.9611 -40.0586
2 20190423_163716_WDPS_20 175.8697 -40.3383
3 20190423_163720_MNGS_20 175.7908 -39.8078
4 20190423_163720_TRMS_20 175.9911 -40.6714
5 20190423_163721_MRZ_20 175.5786 -40.6606
6 20190423_163721_PGFS_20 176.6117 -40.3022
7 20190423_163722_WPWS_20 176.5844 -39.9439
8 20190423_163724_CPFS_20 176.2208 -40.8989
9 20190423_163725_WRCS_20 175.6478 -40.9503
10 20190423_163726_WCDS_20 175.0481 -39.9336
11 20190423_163728_HNPS_20 176.88 -39.6711
12 20190423_163728_PAPS_20 175.005 -40.9144
13 20190423_163728_WAZ_20 174.9856 -39.7547
14 20190423_163729_UHCS_20 175.0408 -41.1269
15 20190423_163730_NGHS_20 176.915 -39.4858
16 20190423_163731_BMTS_20 174.9261 -41.1914
17 20190423_163731_INSS_20 174.9211 -41.2336
18 20190423_163731_PHHS_20 174.9042 -41.2522
19 20190423_163731_WANS_20 174.9311 -41.2311
20 20190423_163732_PTOS_20 174.8603 -41.2231
21 20190423_163732_SOMS_20 174.865 -41.2575
22 20190423_163733_MISS_20 174.8183 -41.315
23 20190423_163733_POTS_20 174.7747 -41.2722
24 20190423_163733_WDAS_20 174.9483 -41.2575
25 20190423_163733_WEL_20 174.7681 -41.2842
26 20190423_163733_WEMS_20 174.7792 -41.2742
27 20190423_163735_PWES_20 174.8258 -41.1275
28 20190423_163740_MTHZ_20 176.8411 -38.8522
29 20190423_163741_TEPS_20 174.7811 -41.2906
30 20190423_163741_TPPS_21 176.0675 -38.6864
31 20190423_163743_RTZ_20 176.9806 -38.6156
32 20190423_163747_NCDS_20 176.8761 -39.4983
33 20190423_163749_TLZ_20 175.5381 -38.3294
---End---
相关研究
相关文章,在仿真秀官网搜索:
场地-城市耦合弹塑性分析+神威太湖之光+无人机 | 三项黑科技助力新北川县城震害预测
层间位移角判别准则不适用于剪力墙,怎么办?|新论文:基于曲率的剪力墙损伤评估方法
新论文:结合BIM和FEMA P-58的建筑地震损失预测方法
新论文:地震-连续倒塌综合防御组合框架结构体系研究
新论文:扔砖头、跳盒子,这也是做科学试验哦!| 地震次生坠物情境中的人员疏散模拟
新论文:改变框架-核心筒结构剪力调整策略对其抗震性能影响的研究
综述:城市抗震弹塑性分析及其工程应用
新论文:适用于多LOD BIM的建筑地震损失评估
新论文:新型地震和连续倒塌综合防御韧性PC框架承载力计算方法
新论文:角柱失效后平板结构连续倒塌行为实验研究
新论文:城市建筑群多LOD震害模拟及北京CBD算例
美国NSF SimCenter+清华城市弹塑性分析=旧金山184万建筑地震模拟
新论文:受折纸启发的可更换承载-耗能双功能耗能器
新综述论文:21世纪建筑结构连续倒塌和鲁棒性的研究和实践
新论文:中柱失效后板柱结构连续倒塌传力机理研究
新论文:一根钢筋混凝土梁,承载力你能算对么?| 梁的压拱效应计算方法
新论文:无人机+机器学习+城市弹塑性分析=震后近实时损失预测
新论文:这个混凝土框架能抗震,能防连续倒塌,还功能可恢复,您不进来看看么?
新论文:一个好汉三个帮|带端部阻尼器伸臂桁架的抗震性能试验研究
新论文:BIM+新一代性能化设计=喷淋系统破坏后的地震次生火灾模拟
新论文:村镇建筑群火灾蔓延模拟与案例
新论文:建设地震韧性城市所面临的挑战
新论文:烈焰焚城 | 地震次生火灾的精细化和高真实感模拟
新论文:城市韧性——基于“三度空间下系统的系统”的思考
新论文:防屈曲支撑伸臂桁架?几个“狗骨头”可少不了!
新论文:城市抗震弹塑性分析中如何确定高层建筑的损伤程度?
新论文:考虑楼板影响的钢筋混凝土框架边柱连续倒塌试验
新论文:提高地震荷载分项系数,抗震安全性提高了多少?
新论文:采用减振子结构来控制超高层建筑的地震楼面加速度
新论文:500m级超高层建筑简化模型及其在结构体系对比中的应用
606m 超高层建筑OpenSees模型