1 引言
昨天看到有一位同学的公 众 号转载了一年前(11/06/2021)写的这篇文章《积水池(Ponded Water)边坡稳定性分析: HYRCAN, SLIDE, PLAXIS LE的结果比较》【BTW,Thank you, Bro!】,忽然想起一个问题,在这篇文章的最后说道:“相同的数据在Plaxis LE上运行,发现安全系数很小,如下表所示。但目前还找不出原因为啥会计算出如此低的安全系数。" 涉及到这个问题的文章还有《池水边坡稳定性分析(Ponded Water)》
事实上,这个问题最近在Bentley工程师的提醒和帮助下已经得到了解决,原因在于设置水位那部分,在图上画出了水位,但不知道为啥水位数据没有保存到水位表中,按理说是应该自动填入的,不过直到目前为止我也想不出为啥会出现这个问题,现在想复现这个错误都复现不了啦。近期将会改写这篇文章及其相关文章,在此先作个简要更正。
2 问题陈述
积水条件下的边坡稳定性(Ponded Water in Slope Stability)分析是岩土工程经常遇到的一个问题,最典型的场景如水库的土坝或土石方坝【从岩土工程视角看本周美国水坝的损坏】,工业场地的积水池(蓄水池)以及采矿工程的尾矿坝等,下面使用HYRCAN分析这类边坡的稳定性,并与SLIDE和Plaxis LE的计算结果进行了比较。
set("Method","GLE/M-P","on","Method","JanbuSim","on","Method","Spencer","on")set("failureDir","l2r","numSlice",50)
extboundary(0,0,40,0,40,4,30,4,10,14,0,14,0,0)
matboundary(0,9,20,9)
definemat("ground","matID",1,"matName","Upper Layer","uw",17,"cohesion",4,"friction",20)
definemat("ground","matID",2,"matName","Lower Layer","uw",18,"cohesion",8,"friction",25)
assignsoilmat("matid",1,"atpoint",4.79092,10.5657)
assignsoilmat("matid",2,"atpoint",5.34701,4.14928)
addwatertable(0,10,24,7,40,7)
compute()
show("allsurfaces")
show("slices")